Up to the highest heights
This last week has been pretty busy, have been hard at work and travelling all over the place. Have also been meeting lots of interesting people including the King and his Queen.
Sunday LunchSo to start of where I finished last week, I met with the guide Chambula to go to lunch at Michaels with Hannah and Catherine (the Brits I had met again the day before). I was waiting with Chambula when he got a call that the King would be joining the lunch. This suddenly changed the tempo as people began to rush around frantically trying to get everything ready for what was now more than just a lunch. Apparently everything happens last minute here and everything is dropped for the King. I continued to tag along to this lunch, hoping I might also be invited to meet the King. Although I felt a little out of place, it seemed ok. We rushed to Michaels house, passing the King on the way, who was cycling along a hill road with a group of children. There was more frantic preparing at the house, and then the King turned up (in his cycling gear, which is lucky as I wasn't very smart). There were various comings and goings but I was introduced and got a chance to join in conversation with both the King and Queen. They are both incredibly humble and a felt very privileged to be able to meet them.
[Photo to come]
Long drive
On Monday we travelled to Wangdue, we left early as it is a 3 hour drive. Although not very far away the drive is long because of the roads which snake their way along the side of the mountains. The drive was breathtaking and we stopped at a Dochula pass (at 3050m) where there were amazing views of the mountains. I was quite glad to arrive at our destination as I was getting a little travel sick, something I definitely need to sort out!
Farm roads
We stopped briefly and Wangdue Dzong which is one of the big projects which the DCHS are running, was quite surprised how busy it all was. So many workers. We then set off to our first visit of the day which was Chitoka, a monastery on top of a hill (like they all seem to be) this was another 30mins drive up an incredibly windy farm road. It turns out these farm roads are going in all over the place to try and provide better access for farmers to sell there goods. There seems to be a push to increase farming as they apparently have plenty of good quality land, but just can't sell the goods.
Terraces
There is little to no flat land around, they have to terrace it all. This is probably why it is so hard to spot fields from lower in the valleys. The main crop seems to be rice. It still surprises me how spread out all the houses seem to be. I do admire their desire to build up hills though.
Super fast survey
We arrived at my first building to 'survey'. It was quite a nice stone and mud building, with some newer mud and timber bits added. We were shown around and I began to record structural issues and was thinking of ways to solve them, it soon transpired that we had very little time. I began to worry how on earth we could make any assessment in the time.
What is our job?
I had not really worked out what my role was, or what the department's role was here. There were also the local engineers who I think would carry out any project. So I just went along with things. Seemed that the building was fairly old, although it is almost impossible to tell with my untrained eyes and the aural history is somewhat fuzzy.
Rebuild?!?
We stopped for lunch, and then I was asked 'so what is recommendation, rebuild?'. I was shocked, both that they expected some kind of recommendation so quick, and second that they were contemplating rebuilding. It was a fairly sound building, although in need of some repair, and clearly has history! I was confused as to what we were really there for, the local engineer seemed worried about the idea of repairing. I think they are just happier to rebuild as it doesn't require 'engineering'. My proposal was to save the old main block and rebuild the monks quarters (drasha's), but I felt this should really be an architects decision on the merits of the building.
Governor
The Governor of the region then joined us. He was very friendly and seemed happy with our proposals. He took us further up another hill to a small temple very high up which was wonderfully peaceful. This apparently was going to be extended, again I wasn't too sure if I was meant to comment, so waited to be asked, which I wasn't.
Wonderful 16C monestry
We then visited another monastery called Chagayna. This involved a nice 30 min walk to avoid a very long farm road. I walked and chatted with the Governor who told me all about the local farming. It was hard to keep up the pace but I managed ok, in the end we left everyone behind. When we arrived at Chagayna it was very clear this was a much older building, and was quite handsome too. It was a rammed earth building with three floors, with very simple details. Seemed very special straight away. When we looked around we noticed very simple nice carvings on all the timbers, some wonderful murals, and my favourite thing which were the floorboards. I saw some which were about 2' wide and 20' long, which were quite something. Then I found some more which were 4' wide, they were incredible.
The plague of corrugated ironIt transpired that the building must be 16th century and largely unchanged since then. The roof had been rebuilt recently, in the traditional way but with slate rather than shingles, and fortunately not corrugated iron. The roof was in great condition, and was just saying so when I was told that it was going to be replaced with corrugated iron. I was again shocked and asked why, and it seemed to be to reduce weight. They thought that the slates would be too heavy, a quick calculation and the slates would be a similar weight to the shingles they would have used before (due to the three layers and the stones they use to hold them down) this didn't seem to convince them. So I also mentioned how they want to keep the weight up so the roof doesn't blow off like at Chitoka. I could not really understand the desire to replace a perfect slate roof with corrugated iron.
We then were asked the question again, we should rebuild it right? Again surprised (although I probably should be used to it now), such an excellent 16 Century building should definitely be saved. I was beginning to think there must be something else going on.
Super fast reporting
While there we agreed to report on the building within 24 hours (!) Of course this is possible, it just means the report is very limited. The next day I proceeded to write up what I thought about the structure in a very brief way, naturally as these things go we ended up compiling the report until late in the evening as I helped with the architecture side too. This report was then submitted to the Prime Minister, apparently it did not go down well as his mind was set on 'reconstruction' and we were saying it should be saved. There is clearly a lot going on in the background that I really don't understand. The prime minister then planned to visit with a couple of my colleagues on friday, so I prepared a structural argument for them (e.g. It has stood for 400 years already! Here are some examples of repairs used else where etc etc).
A proper visit
On thursday I made another visit. This was to Paro Ta Dzong which is the national museum of Bhutan, it is a wonderful circular Dzong dating back to 17 Century. This had some serious damage in the earthquake, with part of the wall collapsing, little has been done except empty the building and prevent people from entering. This visit was far more to my liking as we had time to go over every inch and record properly, we also had existing drawings to use, and there were just two of us and the curator so no rushing about.
Founder of Conservation in Bhutan
Later that evening I had a call from Michael Rutland saying I should come and meet Dorji Yangtse. This was great as she was the originator of my department, and retired just recently. I really needed some advice on how this place works as I was struggling to understand it from my colleagues. We met and she gave me the most amazing advice, I just hope I can follow it. The problem stems from the fact that this whole concept of conservation is really very new and no one knows how to deal with it (and contradicts the buddhist teaching of impermanence). This means that the department can't really operate in the conventional way, and so we need to go about it all backwards to get people on side.
Monks desires
Particularly the owners/users of many of the buildings are the monks, and they are not at all clear on what they want. They have never had to ask permission do to works before so they don't understand how to, they don't express what there desires are for example a bigger meditation hall or more accommodation but rather say this building is damaged so lets tear it down. The real key seems to be finding out what the various parties are after and working to that, rather than just fighting to save the building. I was told that we shouldn't fight at all, as that does not achieve anything here, everything needs to be far more sensitive. I was also surprised to hear that I should not say too much too soon, as my word may be taken too literally, for example if I say this wall is dangerous it may get torn down the next day. Lastly I was also told not to contradict people in public, this I had heard already, but was worth reminding me. I am willing to stand up to anyone (be it Prime Minister of King) if I believe in my cause, I must refrain from doing so!
Leave drawings in the office
Another interesting thing that Dorji said was that when they restored Tigers Nest monastery, she never once took the drawings to site. As they were working with craftsmen who didn't know how to read drawings, they felt threaded when they saw them. This practice I admire greatly, as it is very difficult for professionals to work without drawings as this is the heart of modern construction projects.
Archaeology
Friday and saturday I attended an Archaeology conference. The department are trying to learn about archaeology as it is another crucial part of cultural heritage, and something they have very little experience in. They are also including it in a new Act of Parliament they are drafting in order to protect monuments and sites. A lot of the conference covered the details of the act which was quite interesting as it also covers buildings. Prefer crawling around old buildings to be honest though…
Big Buddha
On sunday I went for a walk to Buddha point and the huge Shakyamuni Buddha statue. It was a nice walk and I met a tourist guide on the way, we chatted about trekking and he told me that the trek to Lingzhi takes 6 days, this worried me again that we were intending on doing it in 3! The statue itself was quite incredible, although the surrounding area was still a construction site the statue was finished. It is 169' tall, made from bronze and gilded, making it one of the biggest in the world.
Nature reserve
Behind the statue I found a nature reserve that had several nice paths through the woods and benches with amazing views over Thimphu. I walked back into town and ended up getting a lift with some locals.
Chileps
I then went to try out another cafe in town in an attempt to meet more people. I met a group of young westerns who were working for various NGOs, finally found people doing a similar thing to make life a bit easier. They identified themselves as Chileps (or something similar) which is apparently what westerners are to the bhutanese. I had not come across this yet, I hope they will be able to give me plenty more good advice.
I have now been in Thimphu for 1 week, and I am beginning to get a grasp on the lifestyle. It all seems to suit me quite well.
Today I found a four leafed clover and it made me realise how fortunate I have been. Of course it is actually about taking opportunities when you see them, but I feel that the right opportunities seemed to have made it my way. I am very thankful for that.
Studying
Much of this working week has been studying, I have been reading all the publications of the Division for Conservation of Heritage Sites (DCHS) in order to get a grasp on the workings of the division, the architectural styles, the common problems and the work undertaken so far. It has been really very interesting, but also gave me an insight into how much work their really is to do. I think that I will get quite busy quite quickly.
My Project List
I have now been given a list of the projects in the office and the ones that I will be working on. This includes:
1. Helping the research good understand the structural properties of the traditional building style.
2. Structural assessment of Para Ta Dzong, which is a circular Dzong damaged in the last earthquake.
3. Technical support for a proposal to conserve Wangditse lhakhang (in Thimphu)
4. Waterproof study, which is the bathroom waterproofing I mentioned before, I have now realised how important that is, more on this below.
5. Website. Surprise surprise… yet another website to make!
I have also now found a couple of personal goals, although prompted by others. One is the waterproofing, and the other is saving Old Thimphu.
Waterproofing
It seems that the biggest reason for using concrete to either replace or to integrate with the old buildings is to be able to waterproof the bathrooms. Now this at first seems silly, because many bathrooms in the UK do not use concrete, and it is clearly not necessary. However the bathroom use here is very different, they do not care for keeping it clean and tidy, and apparently monks are the worst. They have not been taught how to use toilets, and so manage to make a mess of the whole room, with water everywhere. This creates the need for a 'wet room'. On top of this, plumbing is very poor quality and so prone to leaks. Creating a concrete frame in a building just to house the toilets seems like an awful expense to me and so I intend to find the solution of how to make a wet room with timber floor and to safeguard the plumbing. It can't be too complicated right? Any suggestions from Architect types are welcome (as this really isn't a structure problem!). I believe solving this will definitely encourage concrete to never be used in historic sites.
Old Thimphu
The more I have walked around Thimphu and chatted to locals, the more I have realised how important it is to save the remaining old houses. This doesn't seem to appear on many agendas as much of Thimphu has been lost already and so concentration is on other villages. There is also the fact that it will be a huge challenge to persuade the house owners the value of the house and not to replace it with concrete like their neighbours. I am sure this could be made into a positive for them, for example by making it into a tourist area. I should thank Michael Rutland (the Consul here) for being very passionate about wanting to save these and telling me that there is a chance I could do it.
Ex Pats
I met with Michael on Wednesday evening, it was very helpful to get a Brit's view of the place and I got a few introductions to useful people and places, I now know the expats hangout. He came to Thimphu first in 1970 and taught the 4th King, he pointed out that back then there were only 42 cars in the entire country and how much it had changed. Reminded me of people talking about Kathmandu, but this really isn't on the same scale. He was very happy that I was volunteering and self funding, as he said that means I really must want to do it. I had never thought of that before, but its true, I do. I was also introduced to a couple of Brits who had just flown in (as tourists), they were very interested in what I was up to and may well prove to me a good connection.
Expensive Flat
Another good outcome of the meeting was that they nearly fell over when I told them how much I was paying for my flat (I have been asking everyone for help finding somewhere cheaper). I knew it was expensive but that really helped me understand how expensive! They encouraged me to go for somewhere unfurnished, and actually had a couple of suggestions for places. I could get somewhere for under half the price. So I decided to up my game to find somewhere, as my office were not being very successful so far. I chatted to the friends I had made in the cafe in my building and they said that actually the neighbouring building had an apartment free, I checked it out it was pretty good, semi furnished same size as my current place but not half as flash. Price under half the current place so I haggled down further and went for it. Will be moving at the beginning of May.
Directions
This means I will have to buy a few bits, but I am now getting the hang of shopping here. That took longer to work out than expected. The first problem is directions, people are incredibly vague when you ask how to get somewhere. Street names are not really used, and they instead use familiar places, for example I have worked out that my address is 'Next to Druk Pizza'. One of the main familiar places is 'Main Traffic' or just 'Traffic', what this is is the box in the middle of town where a policemen stands to direct traffic. I heard that they used to have a traffic light but got rid of it because no one liked it. I guess thats where the name comes from, and they just dropped the 'light' because that no longer exists. I have managed to get led here, there and everywhere by directions, but I now just either work out where I am going myself or ask repeatedly on the way.
The shops
The shops were also quite confusing to me, as many seem to be inside what I would consider apartment buildings. It took me a while to realise this and when I did the number of shops the town centre suddenly increased 4 fold (the number of floors they use!). They are not very well signed, and its difficult to know if you are just walking into someones house. People don't seem to mind the wondering around though, but the lack of welcoming (as explained before) still gets me.
How much?
I really do not understand how much anything should cost here. I was really disheartened by a couple of trips when I spent so much more than I could have imagined. Then on the other hand elated when some things were incredibly cheap. I don't think I am being duped (well not often) as the prices are usually marked, but if I am then maybe its just charity. I have now decided that I will just accept whatever the prices are and soon I will work out what is what.
Everything is spicy
One of my successful restaurant trips ended up in a very cheap and tasty meal. This was in a apartment style building and very friendly people, a few other people there drinking some beers and watching the TV (more on that later). There are so many restaurants most of them 'Restaurant cum Bar'. I am using them to slowly building up my spice tolerance, as really everything is hot, and I have always been asking for the least hot option. Even when we got chips in a bar, they came covered in chilli. More surprisingly however, when I tried to cook 'bhutanese style' with my own measure of spices it came out too hot!
What to cook
The reason I tried to cook bhutanese is because it is incredibly difficult to find any other ingredients, they have some common vegetables, but really no other ways to flavour than with spice it seems. I have been experimenting, and now have had some tips from people so tonight I intend to try out some unknown vegetables with some unknown cheese type thing. The most tricky thing has been lunch though, most people bring in rice with spicy veg/meat. Since I can't cook it yet I can't do this. I managed to find ingredients to make basic sandwiches, but I feel so ridiculously British its silly. I need to learn to cook this way and fast.
Appreciation of time
I eat my packed lunch with my colleagues for the first time on Friday, yes it took me that long to realise they had a social lunch time. Although I was away for a couple of lunches. It was actually very nice as we shared food and had good conversation. I realised that they see the importance of this kind of time to break away from work. It seems that they try hard to keep the work/play balance correct. Really very nice.
Night life
A couple of colleagues Yeshi (24) and Choening (32) to me out for drinks on Friday. Was a great fun evening, we went to a quite big bar which had some karaoke and then a live band. To me it was incredibly 'quiet' for a bar of its size on a friday night, but for them they thought it was too busy. We chatted a lot about Bhutan while drinking beers and eating spicy nibbles. I learned more about the country and it was fascinating. I also learned about their beers, later in the evening I felt like I had drunk twice as much as I actually had, I was feeling twice as tipsy as I should. I looked at the beer and saw it said 'Super Strong' and then looked and saw it was 8%. This was just the standard Bhutanese beer.
Material world
We discussed a lot of things, and it was really very interesting how strong the Buddhist principles are. Perhaps I should't be surprised, since it is the only remaining Buddhist country, but I was. One particular thing that they were aware of is the increasing desire for material things, I think that this must party be down the introduction of television. It seems that they introduced TV with 40+ channels straight away and this must have been a huge shock to their culture to suddenly be exposed to the material world, with all the adverts telling you you need this and that.
Gross National Happiness
This naturally led on to discussing Gross National Happiness, which they both were very supportive of and believe could work despite all the sceptics. I really hope they are right as to me it is a wonderful concept. The battle is really against the desires of development and material things, as they are often considered to create happiness, but in reality don't. This is well understood by many, as a core buddhist principal but don't seem to be coming out in practice. I was told a story of one sceptic at a conference in Japan, who said they visited Bhutan and saw people working hard in the fields by hand, clearly they were not happy and it was not working. In response the Bhutanese man said that if you had gone a talked to these people you would have seen that they sing while they work, they enjoy being close to nature, they eat dinner as a family etc etc… they are very happy. My colleagues agreed that actually many people in the countryside are happier than the city, which I can see to be true and I hope to find out when I travel. Both colleagues have lived overseas so I was curious to find out what they thought of that. It seems that they think highly of Bhutan, and were keen to come back. They did not like the lifestyle, and particularly the rushed way of the modern life was really not appealing. However they were curious to travel more. It seems like the younger generations are loosing this understanding.
Long Walk
Today I went for a long work to see some of the sites around Thimphu, this involved a climb of about 700m. I again struggled to find my way, with very vague directions that sounded simple until you tried to follow them. It was a great walk as you can see from the photos. When I reached the end of the tarmac road, half way up the hill, I bumped into the two Brits with their guide who I had met with Michael a couple of days before, so I tagged which helped find the way much easier and provided more interesting conversation. This was a very lucky chance (this was just after I found the four leafed clover!). From the guide I learned a bit more about the Kings of Bhutan, it is fascinating to here peoples personal feelings about them. They really seem respected. One particular thing I liked is that the King lives in a very small simple house near the parliament, and his father lives in a log cabin in the woods. Neither have ever lived in the palace. I appreciated having a guide, but also realised that those who were guided were not very free with what they could do and had to go along with the rest of the group. I am glad I don't have to do that.
In this photo, the kings house can be seen just behind the Dzong next to the river with little gold top to the roof.
Littering
On this walk I saw several nice slogans trying to educate people not to litter, I thought they were quite fun so here is a selection. I also found out that they are going to start fining people for littering, which will be monitored by the traffic police and taxi drivers. Apparently half the fine will go to the person who reports it. Seems like a good idea but I wonder how it will work in practice.
Next...
I should be meeting the Brits, the Guide and Michael again tomorrow, should prove interesting. On Monday I am travelling out to some sites, 3 hours drive and one hours walk away. Very excited to see the real countryside.
I have neglected to post anything about Kathmandu, so here is a quick summary and some photos.
Just had my first 'day at the office' and I am pleased to report that I think this is going to work out very well.
(Actually this was yesterday, but never found internet to upload. I have put some random pics in from both days to make it more colourful.)
The office
Firstly, the office (department of culture) is not actually in the Dzong (big fortress), which is quite a relief as it means it is far less formal. The Ministry which contains the Department is in the Dzong however, and it sounds like I may have to make lots of trips to talk to more senior people. I also noticed that people didn't quite arrive on time, so generally the office atmosphere is relaxed.
The first meeting
The day started off with a chat with the devision head, Nagtsho. She seems to be very on the ball with conservation practices and very open to chat about anything. So we chatted about the various challenges faced and I asked a lot of questions (when I could get a word in!). It was an incredible insight into the world of conservation in a developing country, and I found it absolutely fascinating.
Numerous challenges
One of the big challenges is obviously balancing development and conservation. What was quite interesting is that Nagtsho mentioned it was more difficult now with country being democratic (since 2008), and she was worried for the future. This is because the people want development, they desire new bigger and better serviced buildings, which is quite understandable. They think of the old buildings as 'bad' and actively want to get rid of them. This was vividly demonstrated to me today. Yesterday I walked past a small old building near my 'house' which was closed up and had a sign on saying the shop had moved to new premises. I thought to myself, I wonder what they will do with this building, I hope it is put to good use. As you may have guessed, today I walked passed and it was gone. All the carved and painted timbers in a heap.
Education
Nagtsho was aware of this, and one of the objectives of the division is to educate the people about the importance of conservation. The government seems to be aware of the importance, as I was told a few times culture is one of the 4 pillars of the country. The other key group of people however, the monks, are after development even though they tend to live in some of the most important historical buildings. What they ask is why can we not have a better monastery with bigger buildings, more decorative architecture and more paintings. They say that their monasteries are like they are because Bhutan was poorer when they were built. There also seems to be a lot of rivalry between the monasteries, again driving development.
Proof
The other major reason for wanting development is safety, especially after the recent earthquake which damaged so many of the traditional buildings. People think that they are dangerous and so want to tear them down. This is not necessarily the case as many of them have survived, and it is also considered that some buildings which are at risk could be improved. But most importantly some of those which are damaged can be repaired. What the division is trying to do to overcome this, is to prove through engineering methods that the traditional building style is safe in a earthquake.
Tradition
This also highlights that the quality of the traditional buildings vary. The building methods seem to have changed for the worse over the years, meaning that some of the more recent traditional buildings are not structurally sound. The division seems to have some idea of this and are trying to re-educate the craftsmen with the importance of certain details.
Another part of that challenge is that the craftsmen are turning to modern tools and techniques, which also tend to create poor quality buildings. My worry here is not for the bad buildings, but that these crafts will get forgotten. I wondered if this was due to foreign workers, but that is partly addressed as all contractors are bhutanese and there is a maximum of 7 foreign workers allowed on one project (usually indian).
Working together
The other clashes seem to be with other ministries, for example they are having trouble sourcing timber for their projects. This is of course should not be a problem, 80% of Bhutan is forested. The department of forestry is allowing 10% to be felled, and that only by thinning the forests. This is a great policy, as it will preserve the forrest and wildlife, but has a dramatic effect of the building industry and even more so on conservation. A very difficult balance needs to be found.
Under resourced
There are 4 projects which the division has undertaken themselves to show the builders what is possible in terms of conservation, as they were struggling to get contractors to do as they asked. A good idea in my opinion, but they seem to be struggling to get them done on time. They need to be finished within the budget timing which I think is 1 year from now. The timber shortage being a major delay but also there is a lack of personnel in the division.
There are 20 people in the division, and this is covering heritage buildings all over Bhutan. My initial reaction was that this should be enough (I compare Bhutan to Suffolk as it has the same population), but then I realised that there is a huge amount to conserve. Practically every building seems worth saving in my opinion, they are in a wonderful situation in which there is still a chance they can save it all. The other problem is access, the country is more like the size of switzerland and you need to trek for days to get to some of the places.
Outside help
So if they are under resourced why not get in outsiders to do the work? They are not completely adverse to this, and in fact have used outsiders in a few projects. The problem they find is that they do not teach the locals how to do it, and this is obviously very important to make the process sustainable. The other issue is the standard at which they do the projects, it seems that it is too high which makes it very difficult for the locals to understand why it is done (they see it as fixing something that isn't broken). This goes with the need for educating them, but also shows the need for conservation work to be delicate and respect the culture.
Document it all
It seems that with the right kind of proposals they would gladly accept help from outside, but they are quite wisely being cautious. One thing that I think is incredibly important, and that they said they would welcome outside help on, is documenting all the existing buildings. I really wanted to say that you need to stop everything and just document it all now, because so much will disappear and so soon. Instead I asked if they has someone who was responsible for documenting, but unfortunately not. They have been trying to show more people how to do it, but they have found it doesn't get done and that most people find it boring. So if any architects, surveyors, engineers etc want to come to Bhutan and see every inch of it, get a team together and come out! I can't stress how important I think this work would be.
Training
Although they keep sending Bhutanese off for training in various specialities they are finding that it does not work, as often they decide to stay away or find another interest and do not want to bring the skills back. So they have realised that the better way is to bring in people to train people here. Which it seems is why I am here. I am the first westerner to do this, and they keep making sure I know that. They have however had quite a few Japanese working with them over the years, and there are currently three in the office. They seem to really appreciate them saying that they set high standards and do good work. I do not think there is a great difference between Japan and The West, but we shall see.
My role
So it seems that the main things they want me to be doing are: helping generally to increase the standard of their work (they have asked me to be honest and tell them when I think something should be different, this will be tricky), helping to write reports (basically making use of my english 'skills') so they can be published, helping with the research to prove the traditional buildings are sound, and various little challenges which they just need an engineer to help with. I think also they welcome my comments on the conservation plan as a whole, but really I think they have the understanding spot on and just need to implement it. I will probably have to decide at some point what I think is the most important thing to focus on, as I have a feeling I am going to be given too much to do.
This first week they have said that I am just to settle in, which I think is perfect. They have given me the few publications they have produced, so I am busy studying the building techniques and previous conservation works to get an idea of it all. I found that I need to learn the Bhutanese names for all the architectural elements (as they don't really have english names), a good introduction to the language already. I am also going round each of my colleagues to understand what they do. And shall be tagging along on any site visits that happen, first one tomorrow, I am excited.
I really feel that we are on the same wavelength and that there is a strong chance that my presence will make a difference here. I am very lucky to have this opportunity, so I intend to make the most of it.
Enjoy this picture of a huge bhudda statue in the clouds... only noticed it today!
And here are their archery butts, beat Kentwell's!
Had a wonderful few days in Kathmandu, huge thanks to Lucy for showing me about and introducing me to intersting and useful people.
It is now the end of my first day in Bhutan and there is so much to say! Been an excellent day full of interesting things, but above all this seems a beautiful, peaceful and relaxed place to be.
I am going to comment on things as I notice them, without reservation, so please bear with me. I hope this will help me remember how my understanding of the country progressed.
On the wings of a dragon
The flight from Kathmandu to Paro was where I began to get very excited. This wasn't due to the people I met on the plane, which surprisingly turned out to be mostly 'foreigners', I never got a chance to talk to them. I was pre occupied with my mouth wide open gazing at the Himalayas and in particular Everest. I had not expected to see them because they were invisible on the flight into Kathmandu and from in Kathmandu itself due to the summer haze. I guess I didn't factor in this flight being above all that. I thought I may get a glimpse, but actually I had a view of a huge part of the range poking up above the clouds lit brilliantly by the sunlight. And there was Everest at the same height as the plane itself. Absolutely magnificent.
Out of the clouds in to the the valley
The flight was not very long and before I knew it we were heading down again to land at Paro. The pilot gave a warning message to those that had not flown into Paro before not to panic as it is an unusual landing. This got me excited and very curious as to what this could be. As we came out the bottom of the clouds, there were trees to the left, and trees to the right. We were flying through a valley, and a fairly narrow one at that. We were banking left and banking right navigating the line of the valley for quite some time, and then began getting very low, so much so that you felt you could look through peoples windows on the hillside. Not being at all scared of flying, I found this really thrilling and then got excited that I should get to do this another 3 times!
Paro International Airport
After landing I got my first glimpse of the Bhutanese Architecture. I was very impressed. Generally airports do not get the best architectural treatment as function tends to dominate. But here we have the Control Tower, Fire Station and Arrivals Hall. They look old, or I should really say, they look traditional. They are in fact concrete, and seem to be cast in situ into the elaborate shapes and then delicately painted. The impression is really not of a concrete building at all, yet it also does not feel that they have tried to disguise or cover up the concrete. A great achievement. The inside is even more impressive (unfortunately I didn't take any photos), superb proportions and paintings everywhere all very tasteful.
The Drive to Thimphu
I met my driver (Karma) outside the airport, he wore the traditional Gho (robes), as did all the officials in the airport. We got into a rather new 4x4 with DoC in big letters on the side, and set straight off. We soon passed a collection of buildings (I assume this was part of Paro, but not sure), all nicely spaced and continued with
the same style as I saw at the airport. The variations were wonderful and I really fell in love with the style. I think some were concrete and some timber, but actually it wasn't too easy to tell as we were driving past. I was tempted to ask the driver to stop, but I thought we would never make it to Thimphu as we had barley gone a kilometre. There should be plenty of opportunities for that later.
We continued on and after being in Kathmandu I was expecting equally terrible roads, however this one was fairly new (as it is the main link) and so was pretty comfortable. The road wound along a valley, and was cut into the hill side. What first struck me was the angle that they cut the hill back: 90º, yup vertical, and no it wasn't rock it was a stiff stoney clay, it went up 5-10m in places and screamed to me to be a huge risk of land sides in the rain. And sure enough there was evidence of this happening further along. There must be a justification for it for doing it this way, and clearly it has survived a few years, but was interesting nonetheless.
The Countryside
The view along the journey was basically of valleys, with steep forested hills. The ground seemed dry and brown, although Karma did say it had rained recently. There was a nice small river running along the valley. Houses were quite spread out in areas, and some built quite high up the hills. Did not seem at all like how we build in Europe. Karma said that these were all farmers, but I struggled to see any fields or crops. The roofs of the houses were interesting, with some as corrugated iron and others as a shingles (in a very loose sense) held on by the weight of large stones on them. More on these later. The vast majority of houses appeared in good condition and generally the area felt good. However I did not notice what the services were like in these remote houses (I imagine not good as they are so spread out). There were also Stupas up some hills, or temples in interesting spots, lots of prayer flags around especially covering some modern steel bridges which I thought actually made an ugly function structure quite beautiful. There where also large areas of tall white banner/flags, which I have not seen before. As we passed between districts there were amazing large ornate gateways to define it. All this architecture gave a feeling that the country was well cared for and did not appear poor.
Thimphu
As we entered Thimphu (via another gate), it was obvious that the city was growing very fast. Lots of new buildings going up, which gave me a good idea of the structure. They are all concrete frames, with quite fat columns at regular and close spacing. The walls were infilled with brickwork, with the ground floor being quite open. At first glance this does not seem like a naturally good construction technique for earthquake zones, so I hope that some earthquake engineering has been considered as they are all the same. I asked if any were damaged in the last quake, but apparently not (although it was a small one) so perhaps they are ok.
The buildings were still all of the same style, and got more impressive towards the centre. The centre of town stuck me as really quite beautiful, and I thought that they were all quite old buildings. On closer inspection they were again new and concrete. Choening (an architect I will be working with) said that there were very few old buildings left, and much like everywhere else in the world they are being replaced with new ones. Thimphu does not come under the Department of Culture's influence, which I think isn't right (but then I never saw it before). However Choening did say that they have to keep the facade, I didn't quite understand what he meant, but I think it is to keep the building in a traditional style, and perhaps similar to the one that was there before.
My Flat
I met Choening and Sangay at the flat I am staying in, they showed me the place which is really quite nice. It is in one of these concrete-frame-but-beautiful buildings. I am pretty sure I am the first person to live here, it is quite modern, large kitchen/living area fully (sort of) stocked with utensils. Good bathroom and large bedroom with desk and big TV, a balcony with good views. Seems way more than I need to be honest, but it is a nice start. The owners are very nice although quite active, there must have been about 10 people showing me the room. There is also a cafe and restaurant in the building with very friendly staff, who also seem to be my neighbours. It also turns out that the Minister for Health is the owner, so I met him. Was quite interesting as I suddenly noticed a very subtle movement of everyone, showing respect to this older man, I sort of followed suit trying to work out what was going on. He didn't appear to be in any smarter or higher rank Gho, which I think can only be a good thing.
We left the flat and they took me for a wander about town to show me a few useful places, this was great and really helpful. Turns out I am about 5 mins walk from the centre, and 10 mins from my work. The central area actually really feels like a small town and not a capital city. There are lots of small shops, but a quiet and calm atmosphere. Choening actually pointed out that it was really busy, but I could not say that this was busy by any UK standard, and especially not Kathmandu! It all seemed quite clean and tidy and the facilities pretty good. I think that must be down to all the new buildings. We also went to the 'farmers market' which was in a huge open sided building and two floors, local produce on first floor and imported on ground. I was surprised how neat and tidy and quiet this place was, even though it was fairly busy. Not really bustling like you might expect.
Bhutanese Food
After our wander, they wanted to take me to lunch. They asked what food I would like, so I naturally said Bhutanese. They were not sure this was a good idea, as it takes some getting used to. They tend to use chillies as vegetables and all reports seem to say it is super hot. I was glad that they were aware of this, but I thought I would be brave and give it a try. I did not understand what they ordered and so wasn't sure if they asked for it to be foreigner friendly. What arrived was a large dish of rice, a dish of chicken (Maru), some mixed vegetables, and a dried beef dish with shoots of some sort and a lot of whole chillies. The chicken was really tasty and just a little hot, the vegetables were also very good, but the beef was hot. They said it wouldn't be too bad, which I guess is true as I could eat it but it was about my limit. They were busy wolfing down the whole chillies. The meal was served in big dishes and we were given lots of small bowls and a plate. I could not work out how we were meant to eat it, whether to use the bowls or the plate, naturally they asked me to serve myself first and so I asked how but they seemed to think it didn't matter. The meal also came with a glass of hot water, not sure about that.
Free Speech
The meal gave me a chance to ask lots of questions about the country, their traditions and my work. They seemed very free to talk about anything, and happy to give their opinions of the various Kings. One interesting thing was that they thought there was too much hype about their royal wedding, which I thought was good that they do not feel restricted in what they can say (especially to foreigners).
The projects
We chatted about the projects I might be working on, which seems to be 4/5 Dzongs (fortresses) / Monasteries around the country. One of which is the one in Paro which I met some monks from in Kathmandu. More interesting though they said that they wanted to do lots of trips with me to start with, to show me it all. I think this is really important (since I don't know the building styles) so was very happy they said this and told them so. They also then asked if I like trekking, so I said yes of course, although I then remembered I was in the himalayas and that bhutan is the snowman trek which is meant to be one of the hardest, so I back tracked a little and asked what they were asking for. They said that some of the projects they have to trek to. How far I asked? Well, 7 days officially but we do it in 3! Was surprised to hear that, that is a long way in my book. But sounds amazing, so happy I bought trekking gear, but best get some exercise in. They also mentioned that all of them are a few hours trekking, so I really have to make sure I get the information I need when I am there. Not much chance of just popping back.
People
After lunch my colleagues left and so I had chance to unpack and explore. With a bit more investigation I found the flat was lacking a few things, but also the build quality is quite low. Something to look out for in my projects. I wish that they put more care into the windows and doors and didn't give me a TV. But really there is nothing to complain about. On my wander about I realised that the people are just naturally quite quiet. I did not seem to have anyone stare at me, ask me questions or try to sell me something. When I did talk to people they were very happy to respond and then ask me where I was from. I realise now that this is why the market was quiet, there was nobody shouting 'come and buy my veg', you could look without being pounced on.
Lil' Champs
In the happened across an event in the main square, a huge crowd, but quite civilised and some music coming from a stage. Turns out it is a talent competition called "Lil' Champs - The voice of the future" there was a presenter, 3 judges, a rock band and television camera. With various young people coming on to sing and dance. All the people involved were in national dress, which I felt really gave a nice feel to it. It all seemed very light hearted, but clearly well organised. The crowds cheered every now and then. I sat down next a couple of teenage boys and asked them to explain it. It didn't make too much sense, but what I understood was that the final was tomorrow, and the judges were deciding who would go through. This was the first time the competition had been done, and these guys had travelled 6 hours across Bhutan to come to Thimphu for the first time. I watched several performances all of which seemed quite good, and seemed to have some traditional elements even though there was an electric guitar keyboard and drums. Every time I asked what the judges scored them, the answer was 20 out of 20! Not sure if I was asking the wrong question, or if the judges were just too kind.
I did some shopping after the competition, and headed back to my flat. I asked some people where to get dinner this late and they suggested the pizza place next door. Said it was famous and did bhutenese flavour pizza, I gave it a shot and what it turned out was an odd tasting pizza with some hot chilli sauce. Nonetheless it was good and also gave me a chance to read the Keunsel (national newspaper).
Sustainable?
I read an article which really confused and worried me, it was similar to one I read on the plane in the inflight magazine. It seems as though Bhutan is trying to not use timber as it is not ecological (because you chop down trees). The one on the plane was about the roofs of traditional houses. This used to all be the timber shingles stacked on top of each other and help in place by stones. Apparently these have to be replaced every 4 years (at the cost of some trees). This looks very old and a little hap hazard, which I find very attractive, but can understand that it may well not be like that to the owners and no doubt is also quite leaky. These traditional roofs are being replaced with corrugated iron sheets, and from what I saw about 80% has been done. Its a shame as the roofs don't really suit the buildings, but it doesn't look as bad as it may sound. What is most confusing is that this replacement was encouraged or perhaps even suggested by the World Wildlife Fund to protect the woodlands. Without knowing enough details this sits wrong with me. I consider timber to be far more sustainable than iron (as long as the forests are managed) and this replacement really looses a huge part of the style of the building and no doubt affects the culture and community as it would be a change to their lifestyle. The other article was a bit simpler, but basically promoting the use of plastics, explaining how they are a modern and incredibly versatile material, but worst of all that they should be used instead of wood (for windows and doors) in order to help the environment. Granted they did also explain that they should always be recycled, but this does not seem a good way forward. Especially since the timber culture exists and would be easy to keep alive with a sustainable source of timber.
On the other hand I have seen lots of things promoting recycling and against littering, for example I saw a sign next to a river that said something like:
"All lives need water, please keep it pure"
The plastic bags given in shops are biodegradable and have a big notice on them:
"Save the pristine nature, save Bhutan"
And an explanation of why these bags are better (although no mention of trying to avoid using them at all).
I feel as though I have spent the last week comparing and buying things on the internet, I thought I didnt need much but it seemed like a good time to upgrade my kit. Especially as I realised it would be fun to camp in the Himalayas, and I need to squeeze it within the 30kg limit! Just got to watch out for these guys (maybe I should take a bow?).
I think I am now an 'expert' in the following subjects should anyone need advice...
Antibiotics, Base layers, Digital cameras, Down jackets, Duffel bags, Malaria tablets, Long Stay Travel Insurance, Luggage padlocks, Travellers Cheques, Washing down sleeping bags, Waterproof iPhone cases, Waterproof trousers...
Probably all with no real need, just now need to become an expert on Bhutan...